Sunday, 6 December 2015

Look Deeper: Extinction Risks to Soil Biota

Earlier this week, we celebrated World Soil Day (4th Dec). One of the key themes in this years festivities was to highlight the need to increase research into soil ecology and underground ecosystems. In particular, to warn of the potential underground extinction risks that we have an very limited understanding of. A new collection of papers has been published in Nature as part of World Soil Day to highlight these issues among other soil related discussions. So, in accordance, I will be bringing these issues to my blog to give us all an education about soil ecology, as despite the relative neglect compared other areas of ecology, the soil and its biota are fundamental components of all terrestrial ecosystems.

In order to form conservation approaches for underground ecosystems, we need a clearer understanding of the diversity and functionality of them. We know that soils provide vital ecosystem services, particularly for agriculture, so there is clear motive for conservation action - regardless of a lack of moral motive, as concern for things small and dirty tends to be less. The extent of biodiversity below ground is hugely unknown, partially due to the impracticalities of studying these organisms due to their size and inaccessible habitat.  As shown in the graph below, taken from one of the new papers, the vast majority of what lives in the soil is under 1mm in size. What the graphs also shows, however, is the extreme abundance of these organisms - over 1kg of bacteria per meter squared is an insane amount of individuals! Aside from our poor understanding of the diversity, other challenges for understanding potential extinction risks include the lack of suitable models, the complexity and density of microhabitats within the soil and uncertainty about temporal and spatial scales. I'm not going into these here, but they are all detailed here if you're interested!

Soil biota, shown by coloured crosses, are generally very small and very abundant ; Source. 
The most important extinction risk factors for soil organisms are not dissimilar to those faced by their terrestrial counterparts. Habitat loss, a concept we are all familiar with in relation to aboveground organisms, can cause equal disruption for soil ecosystems, for example through the fragmentation of the soil surface via urbanisation. This has been shown to link to declines in abundance of nematodes and other soil biota. Equally, climate change and global warming pose a threat just as they do to terrestrial and marine biomes. Extreme drought events can cause devastation of soil based habitats, for example. Climate change is also thought to have some more complex impacts on soils which can be equated to habitat loss, due to the degree to which the soils are changed. It has been shown that the increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations lead to a reduction of nematode diversity due to the loss of pore spaces in the soil which are required by the organisms. Soil habitats are also impacted by agricultural practices, such as tilling, irrigation and fertilization which impact both soil structure and composition. It is thought that these factors drive constant habitat loss for components of the subterranean community. Although it is difficult, as mentioned above, to know the extent of these impacts, we do know that many of the susceptible species, such as earthworms and mycorrhizas, are of major functional importance to their own ecosystems and ours. There are also potential risks from invasive species, but at a microbial level more than invertebrate, which have likely been spread as a result of travel and tourism. Many of the soil biota are highly specialized in their niche, which is commonly considered to make them more vulnerable to both invasions and extinctions.

So there are considerable risk factors stacked up against soil ecosystems, much as there are against the terrestrial. There has, unfortunately, been very little conservation action in comparison. Some studies have already documented local extinctions of earthworms and various fungi due to the factors discussed above. So perhaps we should start taking some action? This, if any, is a good time to start. 2015 is the International Year of Soils, as declared by the UN General Assembly, after-all. This declaration was made with the intent to raise awareness of the life-supporting functions of soils and to promote the importance of soils in achieving a number of the new 17 Sustainable Development Goals. I hope that you've learned something about the oft-neglected but important goings on beneath our feet, and that in future you might give them a thought in conservation discussions.

Happy World Soil Day! 


9 comments:

  1. Hi Ben! A very interesting blog-post as usual. I have been working for another module and I am looking at a specific satellite (SMAP) which looks at soil moisture and freeze thaw. I believe that these two factors would influence extinction risks of soil species to a high degree. However, SMAP should have the ability to decrease these extinction risks through predictions of floods and droughts and also create the ability of increasing modelling accuracy, hence reducing extinctions. Would you agree that soil moisture and freeze thaw play a vital role in regards to species and also to what extent?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh wow how interesting Maria. Yeah, I agree there is probably a correlation between global warming related changes to soil moisture and habitat loss for soil biota. SMAP sounds good but I don't think prediction will help the ecosystem in the same way it helps humans, unless we start evacuating animals :P Extreme events will keep hitting them.

      Delete
    2. Yes I totally agree with you, SMAP will be more beneficial to humans. However, the use of SMAP in hydrological/ climatological models, would give a more detailed soil moisture record compared to taking samples of soil. Hence, this value of soil moisture, could be beneficial in creating more reliable results of climate models. I was thinking that it would help species in terms of knowing future predictions in climate change in the next 50 or so years and hence trying to reduce these climatic impacts so species would not be affected to the same extent as expected.

      Delete
  2. Hi Ben - great blog post, and Happy World Soil Day (albeit a few days late)! I had never really considered that the same ecological disturbances that effect terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, such as fragmentation, could be so detrimental to soil biota. In regards to climate change reducing soil quality, I believe that natural hazards, such as storms, cylones and hurricanes - due to their extreme rainfall - can really detriment the nutrients in soils too. This is because of a mixture of deforestation creating bare soils for agriculture etc, and the soil erosion rainfall can cause. With climate change increasing the frequency of natural hazards, do you think this will be a big problem for soil biota?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're right, natural hazards do have a big influence on soils and undoubtedly and increase in these perturbations will have impacts on soil biota. Unfortunately, I think that there is far too little research and understanding of what is beneath our feet to know what kind of impacts these will be, let alone how we may be able to mitigate them. I can only hope that something is done before irreparable damage is caused!

      Delete
  3. Such an interesting blog post - you're completely right when you say that you literally never think about biota below the surface! In all the reading I've done for my own blog on climate change and ecology I haven't come across a single piece of academic material that even begins to engage with subterranean organisms!

    Glad that you are spreading the word, and that it's starting to get a bit more recognition! I think from the points you've made this really isn't an issue we can afford to overlook!

    (and happy world soil day lol)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Joe! I'm glad that you've come across the bias as well and that you can now recognise it haha. Happy world soil day ;)

      Delete
  4. Hi Ben!

    I loved reading this post! I'd have never thought about extinctions of worms as something that actually happened/mattered, but now I'm really interested!

    I was particularly interested in your point about travel and tourism spreading microbial-level invasive species - I can't say that I've read much about invasive species at the microscopic level, and in the reading for my blog post on invasives it was mentioned a couple of times that there is serious neglect for studying them at this tiny scale. I have to agree - when I think of invasive species I'll usually think about killer shrimps or red squirrels, not bacteria or fungi in the soil! What are your thoughts on this, do you think that it's a field requiring more recognition? Or should efforts continue being focused on larger invasives?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definitely a field requiring more recognition, and I'm glad that you've come across the bias in your own research as well. From an ecological point of view, size matters, but in the opposite way we would usually think of. These tiny microbial organisms form the base of many food webs, particularly aquatic ones, and are arguably the most important components as the stability of the rest of the ecosystem depends on them. Greater attention is needed, I feel, or else we may be in for some nasty surprises in the future.

      Delete