Saturday 2 January 2016

Paralleling Ocean Acidification to the Permian

The "evil twin of global warming", better known as ocean acidification, is considered an often overlooked but serious environmental impact from anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Ocean surface pH has been decreasing at an alarmingly rapid rate throughout the last 200 years, faster than at any point within the last 300 million years. In fact, as revealed by a study in April last year, the last time ocean acidification occurred this fast, it was a major contributing factor to the End-Permian mass extinction. The Permian, as a quick reminder from earlier posts, was the largest mass extinction event of the Big Five, with over 90% of species becoming extinct. The study found new evidence that extensive Siberian Trap volcanism triggered Ocean acidification during the end of the Permian era which drove the mass extinction and loss of 96% of marine life.

The study collected data using boron isotopes as a proxy for ocean pH and generated models based on this. They found the most likely scenario was two pulses of extinction in a setting where the Earth system began as "primed" for rapid increases in ocean acidity. The first pulse was a slow injection of CO2 into the atmosphere by ongoing volcanism over tens of thousands of years during which the extinctions were mostly terrestrial. The second phase there was a large and rapid injection of CO2, likely from a huge eruption, which caused abrupt acidification of the oceans and drove the loss of the many marine species that went extinct during the event.


An example of what ocean acidification can do to marine biota; Source. 

What does this mean for modern oceans? And why do we need to care? The quantity of CO2 injected into the atmosphere during the end of the Permian was probably greater than today's fossil fuel reserves, however, the rate of CO2 release and subsequent interactions with the oceans was likely similar to current emissions. The rate of release is crucial because it there is a correlation between rate of release and rate of absorption, meaning more CO2 absorbed by oceans ends up as H+ ions, as oceans cannot just hold all the CO2 being released. This means on the whole, more acidification than there otherwise would be. It also means that there is much less time for any species to adapt to changing conditions. 

Modern oceans are estimated to have seen a 30% increase in the concentration of H+ ions since the late 18th Century, which corresponds in a fall in pH from 8.25 to 8.14. This is estimated to reach 7.75 by 2100 if there is not considerable intervention. We can see the impacts of ocean acidification in our oceans already, and many of them mirror the events of the End-Permian extinction event. For example, a group of snails known as pteropods have been identified in multiple studies as experiencing shell dissolution, sometimes as soon as they are born. It is thought that 50% of pteropods species are currently affected by acidification and that this has doubled since the 1800s, and will likely triple by 2050. In fact, all marine organisms which use calcareous materials are at risk of experiencing dissolution. This includes corals, crustaceans, echinoderms and foraminifera as well as the aforementioned molluscs. Additionally, we see coral reef bleaching as the symbiotic relationship between coral polyps and dinoflagellate algae is disrupted due to the algae having a narrow range of pH tolerance. Corals themselves, suffering from both dissolution and bleaching, are a massively important component of shallow water marine ecosystems - they provide habitat for 25% of marine species and drive fishing and tourist industries for many developing nations. (For more on this check out my colleagues blog on Tourism and the Environment).

Coral bleaching; Source.

This is likely what happened in the Permian extinction, the vast majority of marine life in that era had exoskeletal components composed of calcium which made them extremely vulnerable to rapid drops in ocean pH. Whilst modern marine biota is more morphologically diverse, there is still a large component of our ecosystems which is already suffering. Indeed, this component cannot be separated from the system just as it could not be in the Permian and any losses will have unavoidable trophic impacts on non-calcareous species. The "evil twin of global warming" cannot rationally be ignored any longer, and thankfully there was some recognition of that in the recent COP21 talks. Whilst they may not be the most spectacular or interesting of animals (to some), small molluscs, foraminifera and other calcareous micro-organisms form the basis of most, if not all, marine food webs and we need to truly recognise the importance of protecting them and reflect that in policy.

For a practical demonstration of the impacts of ocean acidification, check out this interesting video below!

6 comments:

  1. Hi Ben, a very interesting blog post as usual! I have talked in blogs about geoengineering processes that could reduce ocean acidification (enhanced weathering) or even make it worse (ocean fertilisation).

    I was wondering if you believe ocean acidification has reached a tipping point where it is very hard for these implications to be drastically reduced or if there is still space for salvation? I look forward to your thoughts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting point Maria, I think that geoengineering will definitely have a role to play in the future of ocean acidification. I think we are definitely approaching a tipping point of some sorts. While I'm not an expert and can't really say from a geochemical point of view, I think from a biological stance the tipping point is fast approaching. I think coral reefs are the biggest players in this, once we lose them there will be an irreversible shift in marine ecosystems. Corals have been around since the beginning of complex life, in the Cambrian, and consequentially we do not really have an analogue of what system we might end up with.

      Delete
  2. Great post Ben! I enjoyed the video insert as well :) The dissolution of the chalk in the video is incredibly worrying when a large amount of marine wildlife is calcareous. What can be done to counteract the lowering of pH in the oceans - or is it just a case of reducing the rate at which they acidify rather than actually restoring them to a more neutral pH?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is not a whole lot that can be done unfortunately :( It is a case of reducing emissions to a point where the carbon cycle can catch up with itself, as well as reducing other inputs.

      Delete
  3. Hi Ben, really interesting post! What do you think about the idea of adding mineral dust to the ocean to balance out the acidity? I read about it here and they're calling it a geoengineering technique? I just think the scale which it would have to work on would have to be so vast is it really feasible? http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jan/22/mineral-dust-oceans-carbon-geoengineering

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Holly, I think, like you said, the scale could definitely be a problem for that kind of approach. I could only imagine that it would have similar problems to liming acidified lakes - it's treating the symptoms without addressing the cause. It could, however, be a useful tool to slow the acidification of oceans whilst we work on fixing the issues causing it!

      Delete